The Prime Minister, on the Floor of the House, announced today the decision of Her Majesty the Queen to confer upon the town and residents of Wootton Bassett the title 'Royal' and which will be conferred officially in September this year.
This is in tribute to the Townspeople who, representative of the Greater British People, have stood resolutely with our Armed Forces in their darkest moments when loved ones are repatriated, not to live, but to lay in rest.
It is the first time that this designation has been conferred upon a town in over one hundred years and entirely reflects the mood of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and demonstrates to all of our Armed Forces on active service in the front line and in all parts of the world that we continue to stand with them and support them and their families.
It demonstrates too to the wider world that we are very much a United Kingdom.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
16 March 2011
Wednesday, 16 March 2011
Friday, 11 March 2011
DISPATCHES FROM LIVERPOOL
During the past two years I have been privileged to write the popular column under the heading 'a very british revolution', a title that derives its origin from a quote on national news during the MPs Expenses Fiasco, and the manner in which the British People responded as one, in expressing their extreme displeasure and anger that their own elected representatives had so seriously let them down.
By no means did every member of parliament do this of course. But it is a simple fact: just a drop of acid into a glass of pure water, will thereby render a glass of acid.
But we are a democratic people and we do things by way of peaceful, and some times not quite so peaceful, demonstration, vigorous public debate and ultimately through the ballot box.
In this respect we unknowingly continue to set the standard by which democracy and freedom operate.
The Future
By popular request I have been asked to not only continue writing the column on the blogdspot.com site, but to actually post them to the website www.ianbradleymarshall.com.
This is indeed a privilege and an honour for me.
Liverpool is my home, my City and my people. Our history as a maritime people centres very much upon the Port of Liverpool just along the road from where I am now writing this.
For eight centuries the Port and City of Liverpool have been the gateway to the world, and so it seems right to entitle these letters dispatches.
Of course, there is something of the military in me as my friends and followers will know, and Dispatches from Liverpool is also thereby a direct link with all of our armed forces on operational duty throughout the world, whether on the front iine in war or on the equally important humanitarian front line.
The 21st Century is the most exciting time for all of us to be living in. It is also the most challenging and demanding, and the revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, the terrible earthquakes in New Zealand and now, earlier today, Japan and the horror of the resultant Tsunami makes international cooperation and assistance of the utmost importance.
Let us also not overlook the fact that when an event such as the Japan Earthquake occupies the world's attention, disreputable or petty tyrannical leaders will use it as convenient cover to exact revenge upon the people who have dared to challenge their authority to continue to rule them.
The United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, NATO have all made it clear that the events in Libya may need international military intervention, and in the form of a no fly zone being imposed but only under the auspices of the United Nations.
None of us wishes to see unilateral action. It must be unanimous action through the United Nations Security Council.
Meanwhile, let us all do as much as we can to assist the Japanese People and the other nations that have been caught up in the Tsunami, and let us not overlook that New Zealand must continue to receive assistance.
This is the way forward for the international community; and it will inspire peoples labouring under dictatorship to look to that day when they too can have the freedoms we love and cherish and, not surprisingly, tend to take for granted.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
12 March 2011
Thursday, 10 March 2011
COURAGE - DEFY NARROW MINDEDNESS AND BIGOTRY - GO ON I DARE YOU!
I take my hat off to two young people, the England Cricketer Steve Davies and the Swedish Footballer Anton Hysen, who have done a very courageous thing - they've let on that they are gay. It is not right that they should have to be in the position where they need to make these declarations in the first place. And as Davies beautifully put it when speaking to CNN, there must surely come a time when a person's sexuality will be of no interest at all. These sportsmen have received full support and love from their families, friends and their team mates and are overwhelmed at the international public response.
It enables them to figuratively boot into touch the unpleasant comments (and I put it mildly) that the narrow minded or fanatical will come out with!
Less than a decade ago another young sportsman - an international motor cycle racer did the same. Well if ever "earth's foundations cracked, crumbled and collapsed" it was then. To prove his point to an unaccepting Dad, that young guy went out and promptly won the Isle of Man TT race - one of the most difficult and dangerous racing circuits in the world, so dangerous in fact, that the Late Barry Sheen refused anymore to race there.
This victory, surely, would win his Dad round to support him. Response? A beating up and broken ribs.
We have to accept that some families just cannot get their heads around the simple fact that being gay, bisexual or transgendered is normal and natural. To the religious pundits I say this. I dare you to step outside your own little closet - the Levitical closet that you've somehow wandered or been enticed into and can't find the exit. Stop looking. Be bold. The walls are not high. Just step over them!
In parts of the world my people are still flogged or, worse still, executed by beheading or hanging or, in one country, tied to four cars that then go north, south, east and west from a standing start. In another country, a wall is very precisely constructed. Court officials carefully monitor the bulldozing of the wall on to the convicted "criminals" ie people, including young people, who have been found "guilty" of same sex relations or activities. The court officials and priests wait for precisely 30 minutes before removing the boulders. If any remain alive, they are decreed to be innocent because He from above has ordained it.
Centuries ago, our country dealt with women by means of the ducking stool. They too, if found to be alive after the ducking, were deemed to have been forgiven and declared innocent by God. Of course, most drowned and so were deemed naturally to have been guilty. The practice may have gone but the mental processes take a lot longer to eradicate the motives of people hell bent on destroying others.
Faith is the very fabric of any society. It is the cement in the bricks. But when interpretation of what is written thousands of years ago (and here I refer to all religions because all religions subscribe to the same philosophy) is deemed to be as relevant today as it was at the time of writing, then we surely have a problem.
So to all you narrow minded people I throw down the gauntlet. I challenge you. Go on. Don't bother looking for the door; step over the wall and out into the sunshine. It will be the best thing you ever did, and, rest assured, for those to whom this means something, the very Host of Heaven will rejoice that day!
And to the bigots and narrow-minded, the one trackers, I throw another gauntlet down. Yes I do. I'm a fighter. I'm ex police and ex military.
I dare you to read the two links below and I warn you to keep your hands off people such as Steven Davies and Anton Hysen and all the rest of my people, and young people, who are living boldly and trying to make something of their lives and determined to do good for all of us.
http://ianbradleymarshall.com/thejustincampaign.aspx
and watch the video clip on the Conscience page and have a read too of Sweet Seventeen and Reconciliation.
http://ianbradleymarshall.com/Shoah.aspx
and read They Came in the Night against the music 'They'll Remember You'. The link is on there.
Do yourselves justice, give yourselves a break, live and let live and remember the lessons of history.
Again, for those who know the story, consider what one Man said to the accusers of a woman about to be stoned, 'Let him who knows no sin cast the first stone.' And one by one, pissed off no doubt, but seared by conscience like a red hot poker, they drifted away. A little while later, He says, 'Where are your accusers now? 'They've all gone' she replied.
And here is the lightning bolt, a universal declaration that reaches down and touches every second of every minute of every hour of every day - even to this present day. 'Then neither do I accuse you. Go...'
And if all that doesn't move you, that's no problem. Consider confronting Gareth Thomas who came out two years ago or Ben Cohen and his wife and the many other straight sports personalities who have no problem at all with their gay colleagues and who will be more than happy to withstand you.
Yes: the universal solution that reaches across cultures and religions - precise and simple - but which we have the greatest difficulty with: LIVE, AND LET LIVE.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
10 March 2011
It enables them to figuratively boot into touch the unpleasant comments (and I put it mildly) that the narrow minded or fanatical will come out with!
Less than a decade ago another young sportsman - an international motor cycle racer did the same. Well if ever "earth's foundations cracked, crumbled and collapsed" it was then. To prove his point to an unaccepting Dad, that young guy went out and promptly won the Isle of Man TT race - one of the most difficult and dangerous racing circuits in the world, so dangerous in fact, that the Late Barry Sheen refused anymore to race there.
This victory, surely, would win his Dad round to support him. Response? A beating up and broken ribs.
We have to accept that some families just cannot get their heads around the simple fact that being gay, bisexual or transgendered is normal and natural. To the religious pundits I say this. I dare you to step outside your own little closet - the Levitical closet that you've somehow wandered or been enticed into and can't find the exit. Stop looking. Be bold. The walls are not high. Just step over them!
In parts of the world my people are still flogged or, worse still, executed by beheading or hanging or, in one country, tied to four cars that then go north, south, east and west from a standing start. In another country, a wall is very precisely constructed. Court officials carefully monitor the bulldozing of the wall on to the convicted "criminals" ie people, including young people, who have been found "guilty" of same sex relations or activities. The court officials and priests wait for precisely 30 minutes before removing the boulders. If any remain alive, they are decreed to be innocent because He from above has ordained it.
Centuries ago, our country dealt with women by means of the ducking stool. They too, if found to be alive after the ducking, were deemed to have been forgiven and declared innocent by God. Of course, most drowned and so were deemed naturally to have been guilty. The practice may have gone but the mental processes take a lot longer to eradicate the motives of people hell bent on destroying others.
Faith is the very fabric of any society. It is the cement in the bricks. But when interpretation of what is written thousands of years ago (and here I refer to all religions because all religions subscribe to the same philosophy) is deemed to be as relevant today as it was at the time of writing, then we surely have a problem.
So to all you narrow minded people I throw down the gauntlet. I challenge you. Go on. Don't bother looking for the door; step over the wall and out into the sunshine. It will be the best thing you ever did, and, rest assured, for those to whom this means something, the very Host of Heaven will rejoice that day!
And to the bigots and narrow-minded, the one trackers, I throw another gauntlet down. Yes I do. I'm a fighter. I'm ex police and ex military.
I dare you to read the two links below and I warn you to keep your hands off people such as Steven Davies and Anton Hysen and all the rest of my people, and young people, who are living boldly and trying to make something of their lives and determined to do good for all of us.
http://ianbradleymarshall.com/thejustincampaign.aspx
and watch the video clip on the Conscience page and have a read too of Sweet Seventeen and Reconciliation.
http://ianbradleymarshall.com/Shoah.aspx
and read They Came in the Night against the music 'They'll Remember You'. The link is on there.
Do yourselves justice, give yourselves a break, live and let live and remember the lessons of history.
Again, for those who know the story, consider what one Man said to the accusers of a woman about to be stoned, 'Let him who knows no sin cast the first stone.' And one by one, pissed off no doubt, but seared by conscience like a red hot poker, they drifted away. A little while later, He says, 'Where are your accusers now? 'They've all gone' she replied.
And here is the lightning bolt, a universal declaration that reaches down and touches every second of every minute of every hour of every day - even to this present day. 'Then neither do I accuse you. Go...'
And if all that doesn't move you, that's no problem. Consider confronting Gareth Thomas who came out two years ago or Ben Cohen and his wife and the many other straight sports personalities who have no problem at all with their gay colleagues and who will be more than happy to withstand you.
Yes: the universal solution that reaches across cultures and religions - precise and simple - but which we have the greatest difficulty with: LIVE, AND LET LIVE.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
10 March 2011
REALITY TV OR WHAT? NO REAL LIFE!
It's funny how difficult times or moments of crisis reveal the true character and personality of people. Down the ages it has been the same, and always will be.
Take for instance the award of job seeker's allowance (JSA). For our international readers, this is the allowance given to someone who is unemployed for a limited period of time. It currently stands at £65.45 and rises ever so slightly in April. The award of this benefit is strictly on the basis that it is the starting point from which to work backwards.
In other words, the civil servant sits there and says in effect, 'this is what I can pay you by law; now I have to see if you have any other income that will reduce the amount I can pay you.'
The civil servant leaves no stone unturned. Government policy is clear, precise and to the point. Find evidence to reduce the benefit. That reduction is called the 'disregard'.
We have a national minimum wage of £5.93 per hour which, on a 35 hour basic week would amount to £207.55. JSA, before disregard, on a 35 hour basic week amounts to £1.87. The impact of this is felt when the Job Centre sends out a letter that has missed the franking stamp as the worker has been passing it through the franking machine, no doubt because the worker is bored and more interested in talking about some virtual reality TV programme that has really gripped their imagination for the whole day. Result? Royal Mail slaps a £1.32 penalty postage fee on the letter which the addressee must then go to the local post office which, here in Liverpool, means W H Smiths because that's the only one left in the City, to not only pay the penalty but also the original postage stamp of 34 pence. The out of work citizen now has 21 pence.
But hey ho, he's happy because Tesco have just reduced their national prices in an effort to combat the increasingly competitive ASDA stores, so he can buy that banana after all because one banana has now come down to 16 pence in the local Tesco Store.
Virtual Reality TV? No, this is life in the raw. This is what many people are trying to cope with, and it is therefore no small wonder that bank bonuses are viewed with such hostility.
All of us judge each other by our own standards. If therefore I have £1,000 at all times in my reserve current account, I will naturally presume that you also, regardless of who you are, have a reserve current account and at least £1,000.
If I am at UNI and come from a fairly affluent middle class background, and Dad and Mum pay my bills or make a contribution or bale me out when I get a puncture or have a roadside breakdown, I will automatically assume that everyone else, all my friends, have this protective cushion. It doesn't matter that I've not noticed that they use public transport. I just presume that's choice or because they haven't yet learned to drive.
Conversely, if I watch the TV or read the newspaper about some trouble in a town or city, some uprising, I will assume that the whole country is involved when in fact it is not.
It therefore behoves all of us to try and see the real state of affairs; to try and understand why our friend hangs back when the rounds are being bought, or quietly disappears. "Hey, have you noticed? As soon as it's his/her turn to buy a round s/he's off!" We've all met friends who do that of course and will meet many in the future. But there are many who slip away because they have no option; or they have just spent a whole week's JSA on a round to keep face, and feel a bit low when most of what they've bought ends up on the floor trying to walk back with the tray through the hustle and bustle.
The Recession bites deep. The Recession will be a very long time departing. Many will fall by the wayside on the way, just as has happened in all previous recessions.
The Prime Minister is of course right to remind us all that now is the time to roll up our shirtsleeves. Great. But what if you've already lost your ruddy shirt?
REALITY TV SHOW?
No. A Painful Insight into the Real Effect of the Deficit Cuts
Last Monday I popped into the local job centre - a compulsory 'back to work workshop' at 9am. The JC were blunt and direct. If the claimant does not follow up agencies who do not reply promptly, then the job seekers allowance, housing benefit and any other form of benefit will stop immediately for 26 weeks. Right of appeal? To embark on that route is so complicated and slow, that most are put off just by the introductory and meaningless letter the appellant receives. These are the revised guidelines being issued this week by the civil service to all job centre staffs nationally, implementing a series of very severe cutbacks.
It did not make pleasant listening. I think perhaps the speaker was aiming to shake some claimants out of complacency, but they were in the minority.
It is clear that there is no leeway.
As the speaker put it, 'the decision maker will not be aware of individual facts but will just go by what they see in front of them, figures, facts and whether the boxes they tick will allow the benefit to continue. The aim will always be to find a means of stopping the benefit and getting you back to work, any work, regardless.'
If a job application is completed and filed with the case worker for inputting, but happens to be in any colour other than black, then the JC Team will not process it, nor call the claimant back in to rectify. Thus no record is made on screen so that the next mandatory check will result in all benefits stopping immediately for 26 weeks. This really hit home to one listener who remarked '...k that's six months!
I felt very sorry for many of the people attending with me who are plainly not used to admin, and they left very upset that they are being treated like this. I didn't feel too good myself!
Despite the very difficult times, recruitment agencies do not always grasp the full impact of what is happening. There is still no sense of urgency; but I am mindful too that many employers are playing the market absolutely ruthlessly and therefore putting the agencies between a rock and a hard place.
If a claimant does not have work by the sixth week of claiming JSA they have to undertake unpaid voluntary work to justify retaining the JSA. This will be a full 35 hour week. And we have a loophole here that central government has found, namely, that if a claimant is on benefit then they cannot claim the national minimum wage when central government requires that person to take voluntary work.
This is the very harsh reality of the deficit. It is the peacetime equivalent of the war time regulations of the last coalition government.
Distressing times, and I am thankful that at least I don't have family or dependents. Listening and talking to many of the people I was sitting with makes me wonder how they will cope.
Here's two final quotes from that session that ended at 10am:
A fellow unemployed claimant sitting next to me:"Then I'll just have to turn to crime" - he was utterly dejected.
The Speaker:"You'll all appreciate I've only covered half of the booklet this morning; this is because in line with the cuts, these sessions are ending on 1 April. Sorry!"
If ever one felt like being thrown out of s sinking lifeboat then that was surely it!
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
10 March 2011
Take for instance the award of job seeker's allowance (JSA). For our international readers, this is the allowance given to someone who is unemployed for a limited period of time. It currently stands at £65.45 and rises ever so slightly in April. The award of this benefit is strictly on the basis that it is the starting point from which to work backwards.
In other words, the civil servant sits there and says in effect, 'this is what I can pay you by law; now I have to see if you have any other income that will reduce the amount I can pay you.'
The civil servant leaves no stone unturned. Government policy is clear, precise and to the point. Find evidence to reduce the benefit. That reduction is called the 'disregard'.
We have a national minimum wage of £5.93 per hour which, on a 35 hour basic week would amount to £207.55. JSA, before disregard, on a 35 hour basic week amounts to £1.87. The impact of this is felt when the Job Centre sends out a letter that has missed the franking stamp as the worker has been passing it through the franking machine, no doubt because the worker is bored and more interested in talking about some virtual reality TV programme that has really gripped their imagination for the whole day. Result? Royal Mail slaps a £1.32 penalty postage fee on the letter which the addressee must then go to the local post office which, here in Liverpool, means W H Smiths because that's the only one left in the City, to not only pay the penalty but also the original postage stamp of 34 pence. The out of work citizen now has 21 pence.
But hey ho, he's happy because Tesco have just reduced their national prices in an effort to combat the increasingly competitive ASDA stores, so he can buy that banana after all because one banana has now come down to 16 pence in the local Tesco Store.
Virtual Reality TV? No, this is life in the raw. This is what many people are trying to cope with, and it is therefore no small wonder that bank bonuses are viewed with such hostility.
All of us judge each other by our own standards. If therefore I have £1,000 at all times in my reserve current account, I will naturally presume that you also, regardless of who you are, have a reserve current account and at least £1,000.
If I am at UNI and come from a fairly affluent middle class background, and Dad and Mum pay my bills or make a contribution or bale me out when I get a puncture or have a roadside breakdown, I will automatically assume that everyone else, all my friends, have this protective cushion. It doesn't matter that I've not noticed that they use public transport. I just presume that's choice or because they haven't yet learned to drive.
Conversely, if I watch the TV or read the newspaper about some trouble in a town or city, some uprising, I will assume that the whole country is involved when in fact it is not.
It therefore behoves all of us to try and see the real state of affairs; to try and understand why our friend hangs back when the rounds are being bought, or quietly disappears. "Hey, have you noticed? As soon as it's his/her turn to buy a round s/he's off!" We've all met friends who do that of course and will meet many in the future. But there are many who slip away because they have no option; or they have just spent a whole week's JSA on a round to keep face, and feel a bit low when most of what they've bought ends up on the floor trying to walk back with the tray through the hustle and bustle.
The Recession bites deep. The Recession will be a very long time departing. Many will fall by the wayside on the way, just as has happened in all previous recessions.
The Prime Minister is of course right to remind us all that now is the time to roll up our shirtsleeves. Great. But what if you've already lost your ruddy shirt?
REALITY TV SHOW?
No. A Painful Insight into the Real Effect of the Deficit Cuts
Last Monday I popped into the local job centre - a compulsory 'back to work workshop' at 9am. The JC were blunt and direct. If the claimant does not follow up agencies who do not reply promptly, then the job seekers allowance, housing benefit and any other form of benefit will stop immediately for 26 weeks. Right of appeal? To embark on that route is so complicated and slow, that most are put off just by the introductory and meaningless letter the appellant receives. These are the revised guidelines being issued this week by the civil service to all job centre staffs nationally, implementing a series of very severe cutbacks.
It did not make pleasant listening. I think perhaps the speaker was aiming to shake some claimants out of complacency, but they were in the minority.
It is clear that there is no leeway.
As the speaker put it, 'the decision maker will not be aware of individual facts but will just go by what they see in front of them, figures, facts and whether the boxes they tick will allow the benefit to continue. The aim will always be to find a means of stopping the benefit and getting you back to work, any work, regardless.'
If a job application is completed and filed with the case worker for inputting, but happens to be in any colour other than black, then the JC Team will not process it, nor call the claimant back in to rectify. Thus no record is made on screen so that the next mandatory check will result in all benefits stopping immediately for 26 weeks. This really hit home to one listener who remarked '...k that's six months!
I felt very sorry for many of the people attending with me who are plainly not used to admin, and they left very upset that they are being treated like this. I didn't feel too good myself!
Despite the very difficult times, recruitment agencies do not always grasp the full impact of what is happening. There is still no sense of urgency; but I am mindful too that many employers are playing the market absolutely ruthlessly and therefore putting the agencies between a rock and a hard place.
If a claimant does not have work by the sixth week of claiming JSA they have to undertake unpaid voluntary work to justify retaining the JSA. This will be a full 35 hour week. And we have a loophole here that central government has found, namely, that if a claimant is on benefit then they cannot claim the national minimum wage when central government requires that person to take voluntary work.
This is the very harsh reality of the deficit. It is the peacetime equivalent of the war time regulations of the last coalition government.
Distressing times, and I am thankful that at least I don't have family or dependents. Listening and talking to many of the people I was sitting with makes me wonder how they will cope.
Here's two final quotes from that session that ended at 10am:
A fellow unemployed claimant sitting next to me:"Then I'll just have to turn to crime" - he was utterly dejected.
The Speaker:"You'll all appreciate I've only covered half of the booklet this morning; this is because in line with the cuts, these sessions are ending on 1 April. Sorry!"
If ever one felt like being thrown out of s sinking lifeboat then that was surely it!
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
10 March 2011
Sunday, 6 March 2011
ARE WE DEMANDING TOO MUCH OF THOSE IN THE FRONT LINE BOTH ABROAD AND AT HOME?
Sitting here on the Waterfront is a privilege. But with it comes sorrow at times and these days often tinged with anger; and as I watch international events the anger and frustration at times becomes intense.
HMS Cumberland and HMS Duke of York are both on active service in the waters off Libya rescuing people in the current humanitarian crisis. These ships are due to be scrapped.
Last week I watched HMS Liverpool slip her moorings and sail past, again, destined for the scrap heap within the year.
HMS Campbeltown has steamed in this week and, unexpectedly, for its final visit to its homeport of Liverpool, for it was built across the water at the famous now defunct Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Yard in 1987.
With 255 crew, some of whom come from Liverpool, we are now informed that this is her last visit; that due to the defence cuts she will be decommissioned even though at the time of the announcement Laura Jones, Staff Writer in the Liverpool Daily Post (4.3.2011 page 10) reports that this was just “as she was preparing to deploy for counter-piracy operations in the Indian Ocean and after a refit and full crew training had readied her for duty.”
Her Commanding Officer, Commander Keri Harris RN comments, and again I’m quoting from Ms Jones’ excellent article:
“In the past months, we have been able to operate at sea with a tangible output, training the many specialists who encompass the navy’s wide operational remit. Now we are faced with the reality of decommissioning a fine warship and disbanding her close-knit crew, which was never going to be easy.”
It is even more disconcerting when one realises that the crew have no guarantee of a secure future; most certainly some will lose their jobs as a result of Whitehall’s insistence that the Royal Navy must lose at least 5,000 personnel as part of the deficit commitment.
We ask that our Armed Forces be prepared to make the ultimate individual sacrifice. We have currently lost 358 personnel. Everyone of our troops works under the weight of the question, will I be the three hundred and fifty Ninth, and if not, then which number will I be?
It reminds me of my Uncles who were also killed in action during WW2 on RAF bombing operations over Germany. I grew up with this quote in my head as a young boy; my uncle and namesake had told Dad that the average life expectancy was four missions before being shot down. And guess what? He was shot down on his fourth mission. At age 21 that takes guts. And it is no less true today.
We should not be hamstringing our Armed Forces. Let us look closer to home where we have a mother on benefits who, it is now discovered, has on the strength of those benefits, had a swimming pool installed for her family.
The mind boggles.
It is not right that our Armed Forces and our Police Force, committing themselves to a lifetime’s service, the latter for 30 years, now live and work under the threat of the axe falling upon them.
The Government is right to take drastic action. We know and accept that. But let us also think these through carefully.
The Bank of England
I am pleased that Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, has made it clear that, in his opinion, the banks are just not doing enough. He has surely fired a warning shot that makes it clear. When the Bank of England replaces the Financial Services Authority, these banks are going to have to do a lot, lot better and that Mr King is just the person to ensure this.
The banks are dilatory and remaining firmly self-serving.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
6 March 2011
HMS Cumberland and HMS Duke of York are both on active service in the waters off Libya rescuing people in the current humanitarian crisis. These ships are due to be scrapped.
Last week I watched HMS Liverpool slip her moorings and sail past, again, destined for the scrap heap within the year.
HMS Campbeltown has steamed in this week and, unexpectedly, for its final visit to its homeport of Liverpool, for it was built across the water at the famous now defunct Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Yard in 1987.
With 255 crew, some of whom come from Liverpool, we are now informed that this is her last visit; that due to the defence cuts she will be decommissioned even though at the time of the announcement Laura Jones, Staff Writer in the Liverpool Daily Post (4.3.2011 page 10) reports that this was just “as she was preparing to deploy for counter-piracy operations in the Indian Ocean and after a refit and full crew training had readied her for duty.”
Her Commanding Officer, Commander Keri Harris RN comments, and again I’m quoting from Ms Jones’ excellent article:
“In the past months, we have been able to operate at sea with a tangible output, training the many specialists who encompass the navy’s wide operational remit. Now we are faced with the reality of decommissioning a fine warship and disbanding her close-knit crew, which was never going to be easy.”
It is even more disconcerting when one realises that the crew have no guarantee of a secure future; most certainly some will lose their jobs as a result of Whitehall’s insistence that the Royal Navy must lose at least 5,000 personnel as part of the deficit commitment.
We ask that our Armed Forces be prepared to make the ultimate individual sacrifice. We have currently lost 358 personnel. Everyone of our troops works under the weight of the question, will I be the three hundred and fifty Ninth, and if not, then which number will I be?
It reminds me of my Uncles who were also killed in action during WW2 on RAF bombing operations over Germany. I grew up with this quote in my head as a young boy; my uncle and namesake had told Dad that the average life expectancy was four missions before being shot down. And guess what? He was shot down on his fourth mission. At age 21 that takes guts. And it is no less true today.
We should not be hamstringing our Armed Forces. Let us look closer to home where we have a mother on benefits who, it is now discovered, has on the strength of those benefits, had a swimming pool installed for her family.
The mind boggles.
It is not right that our Armed Forces and our Police Force, committing themselves to a lifetime’s service, the latter for 30 years, now live and work under the threat of the axe falling upon them.
The Government is right to take drastic action. We know and accept that. But let us also think these through carefully.
The Bank of England
I am pleased that Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, has made it clear that, in his opinion, the banks are just not doing enough. He has surely fired a warning shot that makes it clear. When the Bank of England replaces the Financial Services Authority, these banks are going to have to do a lot, lot better and that Mr King is just the person to ensure this.
The banks are dilatory and remaining firmly self-serving.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
6 March 2011
Friday, 4 March 2011
BE YOU EVER SO HIGH, THE LAW IS ALWAYS ABOVE YOU!
Thus did our lecturer present his opening of the subject "British Constitution and Public Law", a very important subject for us at that time and without which I would not have qualified eventually as a Constable. It was a long course too and in pre computer days, desks were piled high with text books and drafts and, with each lecture, much heated discussion and debate.
But that opening phrase, first spoken by Thomas Fuller the famous 17th Century churchman and historian, resonated so strongly with me, as indeed the lecturer had intended. It has formed the bedrock of my whole professional life. It is what enabled me to exercise powers of arrest when it could quite easily have been simpler to say that I was being intimidated and would thus back down. I remember one titled lady affronted by my suggestion that she had committed a serious criminal offence. "Don't you realise who I am?" "Yes, I do indeed, your Ladyship. It makes no difference."
When she was released on bail later that day she had had cause to reflect upon that statement no doubt. That is now long ago. Gosh she must be in her late 50s like me.
Earlier this week we had a public broil between the managers of Rangers and Celtic. We are used to seeing players sometimes lose their cool and lash out at each other. We do not expect to see that abusive behaviour then copied by managers. Get real! You're playing, or managing, nothing more than a game of soccer.
I love soccer, but get it in perspective. Far more important things are happening these days. Managers are also role models for young people and indeed middle and higher management too. So remember your role and perform accordingly.
It is therefore very reassuring to see the Assistant Chief Constable of Strathclyde make it clear yesterday on BBC News. It does not matter whether they are managers, whether this is just a football match, whether the incident can be seen to be therefore something that one can turn a blind eye to. He did not care what people thought, what people in high places might say. His duty was clear. He would enforce the law. And if he saw that there was prima facie evidence to lay criminal charges, he would do so.
This is precisely how it should be. It is a reminder of that wonderful maxim uttered years ago by my lecturer, Mr Edgar Jones, himself a former police officer with a distinguished service record.
Be you ever so high, the law is always above you!
It is a maxim that Colonel Gaddafi is very quickly coming to understand as the International Court of Human Rights gathers evidence of crimes against humanity by him and some members of his family and by members of his regime.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
4 March 2011
But that opening phrase, first spoken by Thomas Fuller the famous 17th Century churchman and historian, resonated so strongly with me, as indeed the lecturer had intended. It has formed the bedrock of my whole professional life. It is what enabled me to exercise powers of arrest when it could quite easily have been simpler to say that I was being intimidated and would thus back down. I remember one titled lady affronted by my suggestion that she had committed a serious criminal offence. "Don't you realise who I am?" "Yes, I do indeed, your Ladyship. It makes no difference."
When she was released on bail later that day she had had cause to reflect upon that statement no doubt. That is now long ago. Gosh she must be in her late 50s like me.
Earlier this week we had a public broil between the managers of Rangers and Celtic. We are used to seeing players sometimes lose their cool and lash out at each other. We do not expect to see that abusive behaviour then copied by managers. Get real! You're playing, or managing, nothing more than a game of soccer.
I love soccer, but get it in perspective. Far more important things are happening these days. Managers are also role models for young people and indeed middle and higher management too. So remember your role and perform accordingly.
It is therefore very reassuring to see the Assistant Chief Constable of Strathclyde make it clear yesterday on BBC News. It does not matter whether they are managers, whether this is just a football match, whether the incident can be seen to be therefore something that one can turn a blind eye to. He did not care what people thought, what people in high places might say. His duty was clear. He would enforce the law. And if he saw that there was prima facie evidence to lay criminal charges, he would do so.
This is precisely how it should be. It is a reminder of that wonderful maxim uttered years ago by my lecturer, Mr Edgar Jones, himself a former police officer with a distinguished service record.
Be you ever so high, the law is always above you!
It is a maxim that Colonel Gaddafi is very quickly coming to understand as the International Court of Human Rights gathers evidence of crimes against humanity by him and some members of his family and by members of his regime.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
4 March 2011
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
ORDER, COUNTER ORDER, DISORDER - KEEPING CALM WHILST CONSIDERING ALL OPTIONS
We are watching momentous events in Libya and as I have said on several occasions now, all of us owe a great deal to the bravery and courage of our Journalists, Reporters and Camera Crews.
The Prime Minister was right to express our resolve on the floor of the House of Commons for Mr Cameron was directly addressing the Nation, not England, but the United Kingdom. It is pleasing to see that throughout these challenging times, the devolved government of the UK is not in any way inhibiting the whole Nation from acting as one.
It is also very comforting to know that we have chartered aircraft to carry out a series of airlifts of up to 6,000 of the foreign workers of all nations, currently trapped on the Libyan border; that other nations are acting similarly and we are therefore seeing a practical demonstration of the United Nations working together. Likewise HMS Cumberland and HMS Duke of York are also now undertaking continued rescue of people.
Libya itself is in a mess. It can put up one aircraft and still fail to hit its target, an ammunition dump, after four attempts. What was going to be the rout of the coastal towns this morning by the Libyan People's Army fizzled out.
But we also see the supporters of Colonel Gaddafi becoming very excited and quite honestly living in a dream world. This dream world has every possibility of becoming an absolute nightmare if the present situation becomes a Crisis and that Crisis turns into open Civil War. We saw Civil War in the Balkans, we saw the savagery of a divided people in Kosovo. Foreign military intervention was required.
The present situation is demanding diplomacy at the highest levels. Much is at stake. No doubt we will have Thursday Evening Question Time chuntering on about the West's greed for oil and those spouting that line trying to make all of us feel guilt. But it comes down to simple home economics. The Motorist. The local business reliant upon its fleet of lorries to transport its goods. If the antics of a government in some far away country pushes prices up at the petrol pump, that is when people will think again about military intervention.
If the UN did have to take military action it is doing so for completely different reasons to that which brought about the Second Iraq War.
We do not want to take military action. We do not want to have to commit our troops to a conflict that quickly has the local population turn on them and accuse them of becoming the aggressor, the occupier. What people want to see is the right of the Libyan People to determine their own future, their own Parliament.
The vast majority of the Libyan People want a complete change. They want to enjoy that freedom in life that we take for granted. They want the right to self-determination.
We have the mandate thus far of a unanimous security council resolution. That is unprecedented, for it means that Russia and China too have agreed with that resolution.
We do not want to commit our armed forces, especially given the swinging defence cuts that are being applied. It is a pity that the Government cannot, at this eleventh hour, reverse its decision on scrapping some of our assets.
But I commend the Government also for maintaining a steady course, keeping calm whilst considering all options.
Let us hope that neither the Pentagon nor Whitehall will need to issue an order of the day that sends our armed forces into another war. Let us hope that, somehow, the Libyan People will be able to remove Colonel Gaddafi from power confident in the knowledge that they have the full support of the international community.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
3 March 2011
The Prime Minister was right to express our resolve on the floor of the House of Commons for Mr Cameron was directly addressing the Nation, not England, but the United Kingdom. It is pleasing to see that throughout these challenging times, the devolved government of the UK is not in any way inhibiting the whole Nation from acting as one.
It is also very comforting to know that we have chartered aircraft to carry out a series of airlifts of up to 6,000 of the foreign workers of all nations, currently trapped on the Libyan border; that other nations are acting similarly and we are therefore seeing a practical demonstration of the United Nations working together. Likewise HMS Cumberland and HMS Duke of York are also now undertaking continued rescue of people.
Libya itself is in a mess. It can put up one aircraft and still fail to hit its target, an ammunition dump, after four attempts. What was going to be the rout of the coastal towns this morning by the Libyan People's Army fizzled out.
But we also see the supporters of Colonel Gaddafi becoming very excited and quite honestly living in a dream world. This dream world has every possibility of becoming an absolute nightmare if the present situation becomes a Crisis and that Crisis turns into open Civil War. We saw Civil War in the Balkans, we saw the savagery of a divided people in Kosovo. Foreign military intervention was required.
The present situation is demanding diplomacy at the highest levels. Much is at stake. No doubt we will have Thursday Evening Question Time chuntering on about the West's greed for oil and those spouting that line trying to make all of us feel guilt. But it comes down to simple home economics. The Motorist. The local business reliant upon its fleet of lorries to transport its goods. If the antics of a government in some far away country pushes prices up at the petrol pump, that is when people will think again about military intervention.
If the UN did have to take military action it is doing so for completely different reasons to that which brought about the Second Iraq War.
We do not want to take military action. We do not want to have to commit our troops to a conflict that quickly has the local population turn on them and accuse them of becoming the aggressor, the occupier. What people want to see is the right of the Libyan People to determine their own future, their own Parliament.
The vast majority of the Libyan People want a complete change. They want to enjoy that freedom in life that we take for granted. They want the right to self-determination.
We have the mandate thus far of a unanimous security council resolution. That is unprecedented, for it means that Russia and China too have agreed with that resolution.
We do not want to commit our armed forces, especially given the swinging defence cuts that are being applied. It is a pity that the Government cannot, at this eleventh hour, reverse its decision on scrapping some of our assets.
But I commend the Government also for maintaining a steady course, keeping calm whilst considering all options.
Let us hope that neither the Pentagon nor Whitehall will need to issue an order of the day that sends our armed forces into another war. Let us hope that, somehow, the Libyan People will be able to remove Colonel Gaddafi from power confident in the knowledge that they have the full support of the international community.
Ian Bradley Marshall
LIVERPOOL
3 March 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
